Research paper about: why mainstream 'Cyber-Security' methods are failing,
and how to do it correctly.
Part .a.
Why & How mainstream 'Cyber Security' is failing to deliver.
Status: Continues RFC
First publication: 2nd Quarter, 2012
Release v1.2: 1st Quarter 2016
Release v1.3: 1st Quarter 2020
Paper28a
"Executive summary:
At present popular 'security' methods are largely based on stubborn misconceptions and conflict of interests.
In this first part we explain in layman's terms what is actually causing the widespread 'security' failure.
Paper28a takes a bit of effort to read through, but will be worthwhile.
The document can enable a better grip on protection concerns, by providing
insight into the major factors for failures in the mainstream 'security' approach.
Part .b.
How to do it right (.a.+DDTT&KISS):
Status: Finalised.
Filed: 4th Quarter, 2012
Paper28b.pdf (Classified information)
"With part b, we explain in layman's terms how to move from deficient conventional 'security' to a practical safeguard structure with clear and simple logic.
At the same time a safeguard structure brings about significant reduction in costs by eliminating issues like counter-productive complexity. There are also several other beneficial effects, like naturally increasing overall skill, adaptability/flexibility and job enjoyment level.
We can teach and guide you and your people where needed.
So you can incorporate the simple natural structure into your organisation.
If you want to know the details of how it works, just ask 📧
We first have to verify if you are friend or foe.
